OAK

Effectiveness of kaolin-impregnated hemostatic gauze use in preperitoneal pelvic packing for patients with pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability: A propensity score matching analysis

Metadata Downloads
저자
Kwangmin Kim ; Hongjin Shim ; Pil Young Jung ; Seongyup Kim ; Young Un Choi ; Keum Seok Bae ; Jung Kuk Lee ; Ji Young Jang
키워드 (영문)
medicine and health scienceshematologyhemostaticsdiagnostic medicinesigns and symptomshemorrhagepathology and laboratory medicinevascular medicinecritical care and emergency medicinetrauma medicinetraumatic injurybone fracturehealth carehealth care facilitieshospitalsintensive care unitsbiology and life sciencespopulation biologypopulation metricsdeath rateshemodynamicssurgical and invasive medical procedurescell biologycellular typesanimal cellsimmune cellsantigen-presenting cellsimmunologypathologybandageshumansmiddle agedfracturesbonemalecase-control studiesfemaleretrospective studieschemistrylength of staycomplicationserythrocyte transfusionsurvival ratetreatment outcomeprevention & controlhypotensionfracture fixationpropensity scorehemostatic techniquesmortalityadverse effectsagedkaolinsurgerysurgical taperetrospective cohort studypropensity score matchingpelvic fracturemedicineintensive care unitcase-control studymedical recordin patienthemostatic gauzehemodynamic instability
발행연도
2020-07
발행기관
medline
유형
Article
초록
IntroductionWe evaluated the effectiveness of kaolin-impregnated hemostatic gauze use in preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) for patients with hemodynamic instability due to severe pelvic fractures. Materials and methodsBetween May 2014 and October 2018, 53 of 75 patients who underwent PPP due to hemodynamic instability induced by pelvic fracture were enrolled. Their medical records were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. QuikClot combat gauze (hydrophilic gauze impregnated with kaolin) and general surgical tape were used in 21 patients, while general surgical tape was used in the remaining 32 patients. ResultsAs there were differences in the characteristics of patients between the hemostatic gauze (HG) group and control group, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for age, sex, and lactate levels. After PSM, the clinical characteristics between the two groups became similar. There were no differences in the rates of mortality and hemorrhage-induced mortality between the two groups. However, the packed red blood cell (RBC) requirement for an additional 12 hours in the HG group was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.1 ± 3.5 vs. 7.6 ± 6.1 units, p = 0.035). The lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays tended to be shorter in the HG group than in the control group (11.6 vs. 18.5 days, p = 0.1582; 30.8 vs. 47.4 days, p = 0.1861, respectively). ConclusionsThe use of HG during PPP did not reduce hemorrhage-induced mortality, but did reduce the need for additional packed RBC transfusions in patients with hemodynamic instability due to severe pelvic fractures.
저널명
PLoS ONE
저널정보
(2020-07). PLoS ONE, Vol.15(7), e0236645–e0236645
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0236645
연구주제분류:
NHIMC 학술성과 > 1. 학술논문
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Loading...