OAK

Antibody Detection in Healthcare Workers after Vaccination with Two Doses of the BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 Vaccine

Metadata Downloads
저자
노경호 ; 최흔 ; 최희경 ; 윤미선 ; 유종하 ; 박윤선
키워드 (영문)
covid-19evaluationimmunoassayvaccineskeywords: covid-19
발행연도
2022-09
발행기관
대한임상미생물학회
유형
Article
초록
Background: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, from 2020, many pharmaceutical companies have developed vaccines. To determine the efficacy of AstraZeneca’s and Pfizer’s vaccines, which were the first and second vaccines to be approved in Korea, respectively, we developed a method to measure their antibody-generating efficacies using immunology analyzers and a rapid antibody test available in Korea.

Methods: The antibody-stimulating efficacies of the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines were evaluated using Centaur. XPT SARS-CoV-2 (Siemens Healthineers, Germany), Elecsys. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), and STANDARD F SARS-CoV-2 nAb FIA (SD Biosensor, Korea). Healthcare workers were enrolled in two groups: the Pfizer (121) and AstraZeneca (117) groups. Antibody levels were measured pre-vaccination, three weeks after vaccination, and 16 weeks after vaccination.

Results: The Pfizer group comprised 41 males and 80 females, while the AstraZeneca group comprised 38 males and 79 females. Antibody results were analyzed after excluding four individuals who had recovered from COVID-19. Between weeks 3 and 16, there was no significant difference (P= 0.5, 1.0) between the results of the Roche and Siemens antibody tests in the Pfizer vaccine group. However, the SD biosensor results comparing with the Roche and Siemens antibody tests at three weeks after the initial vaccination showed a significant difference (P < 0.0001). Analysis of the Roche antibody test results before, at three weeks, and at 16 weeks after the administration of the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines revealed a statistically significant difference between before and at three weeks after the first injection (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: After two doses of the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines, antibody formation was above the 90th percentile of the measurement range in all subjects.
저널명
Annals of Clinical Microbiology
저널정보
(2022-09). Annals of Clinical Microbiology, Vol.25(3), 91–101
ISSN
2288-0585
DOI
10.5145/ACM.2022.25.3.4
연구주제분류:
NHIMC 학술성과 > 1. 학술논문
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Loading...